Hollywood has had a lot of success, critical and commercial
alike, mining Broadway for content over the years. While a strong effort from
the cast and crew is essential, it can’t be denied that the best movie musicals
pretty much all start out with stellar source material. So what happens when
the inspiration is lackluster? In the case of Hello Again, one is left with a numbingly repetitive look at a
century’s worth of unsatisfying sexual encounters that wears out its welcome
before it ever settles in.
Based on Arthur Schnitzler’s play La Ronde, Hello Again
follows a daisy-chain of encounters that span from 1901 to present day, one
character from each scene progressing into the next with a new partner. Because
the scenes don’t unfold in chronological order the only real connection between
each vignette is a musical motif…and the crushing ennui suffered by each successive
pair of participants. On display is a revolving door of misery, degree being
the only variable. With no catharsis in sight, Hello Again quickly falls victim to the law of diminishing returns.
You can only be beaten down by the message of man’s fundamental isolation for
so many scenes before apathy or irritation inevitably sets in.
Nolan Gerard Funk and Sam Underwood in Hello Again |
(It should also be noted that in the majority of these
encounters, one person must persuade or cajole the other into intercourse. The
musical premiered in 1993 and the filmmakers certainly can’t control current
events, but nonetheless that behavior adds a considerable layer of discomfort
when viewed in light of the recent accusations against Harvey Weinstein, Kevin
Spacey, and others.)
The diverse ensemble have varying degrees of singing
experience; some (Jenna Ushkowitz as the Nurse, Audra McDonald as the Actress)
make the most of their appearances, while others fall resoundingly flat (Sam
Underwood as the Whore, Nolan Gerard Funk as the Soldier). Minimal choreography
accompanies the songs, and what little does occur suffers from so many jump
cuts that no two consecutive steps are contained in the same shot.
Ultimately, however, no vocal talent or flashy dance moves
can distract from the sub-par material at the foundation of Hello Again. Schnitzler’s play wasn’t
performed until 1920, twenty years after its publication. Attitudes towards sex
differ greatly between then and now, making the intimate encounters across
social boundaries feel much less transgressive now than they did at the turn of
the 20th century. Even when minor tweaks to the original story or conscious
casting decisions create couples who are not exclusively heterosexual and
white, those changes feel expected, or even overdue. Hello Again wants to shock and provoke with its dour outlook;
instead it bores. If only art had better imitated life, intermixing gratifying
relationships in with those less so, it could have added a great deal more
poignancy to both.
RATING: Zero stars
No comments:
Post a Comment